Skip to content
EveryFix

One Rep Max Calculator

The One Rep Max Calculator estimates the most weight you could lift for a single rep (1RM) from a set you’ve done, using the Epley and Brzycki formulas. It also gives a percentage table of working weights for different rep targets. Epley and Brzycki tend to agree closely within the 1–10 rep range this calculator is built for, but they diverge more as reps climb — Brzycki's formula also breaks down mathematically as reps approach 37 (its denominator, 37 − reps, approaches zero), which is one reason this calculator caps input at 20 reps rather than letting it run higher. Both formulas were validated primarily on major compound barbell lifts like the bench press, back squat, and deadlift, and tend to be less reliable for lifts with a heavier stabilization or skill component — think overhead presses or Olympic lifts — where technique breakdown can limit reps before muscular fatigue does. Because the estimate is a projection from a submaximal set rather than a directly tested max, factors like sleep, hydration, and how close to true failure the set was taken can shift the real number by several percent in either direction.

Beginner⏱ 30 secondsUpdated 2026-07-09
Estimated one-rep max
212lb
Epley 216 · Brzycki 208 lb

Training weights by rep target

212 lb
1 rep · 100%
201 lb
2 reps · 95%
197 lb
3 reps · 93%
191 lb
4 reps · 90%
184 lb
5 reps · 87%
180 lb
6 reps · 85%
170 lb
8 reps · 80%
159 lb
10 reps · 75%
148 lb
12 reps · 70%

Averages the Epley and Brzycki formulas — reliable estimates for about 1–10 reps. The percentage table helps you pick working weights. Warm up, use a spotter, and never test a true 1RM without proper preparation. Estimates only.

How This Tool Works

Enter the weight you lifted and how many reps you completed. You’ll get your estimated 1RM plus a table of training weights for common rep targets (from 1 up to 12 reps).

Formula & Method

Epley: 1RM = weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30). Brzycki: 1RM = weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps). The calculator averages the two, which are most accurate in the 1–10 rep range.

Example Calculation

Say you bench press 185 lb for 5 reps. Epley: 1RM = 185 × (1 + 5⁄30) = 185 × 1.1667 = 215.83 lb. Brzycki: 1RM = 185 × 36 ÷ (37 − 5) = 185 × 36 ÷ 32 = 185 × 1.125 = 208.13 lb. The calculator averages the two: (215.83 + 208.13) ÷ 2 = 211.98, which rounds to a 212 lb estimated one-rep max. For a 10-rep working set, the percentage table applies 75% of that: 212 × 0.75 = 159 lb.

Please note: This calculator provides general estimates only and is not medical advice. It cannot account for your full medical history or individual circumstances — consult a doctor or qualified healthcare provider for guidance specific to you.

About the One Rep Max Calculator

A one-rep max, usually shortened to 1RM, is the heaviest weight you can move through a full range of motion for exactly one repetition with acceptable technique. It is the standard yardstick for strength, the number lifters compare across months, and the anchor that most percentage-based training programs are built on. The trouble is that finding it directly means loading a bar to your limit, which takes careful warm-up, ideally a spotter, and carries real injury risk if form slips on a failed attempt.

This calculator sidesteps that by estimating your max from a lighter set you have already done. You enter the weight you lifted and how many clean repetitions you completed, and it applies two well-known prediction formulas, Epley and Brzycki, then averages them. Epley multiplies your weight by one plus the reps divided by 30. Brzycki multiplies your weight by 36 divided by 37 minus the reps. Both treat each additional rep as evidence of a proportionally higher ceiling, which works reasonably well for sets of about 1 to 10 reps.

Beyond the single number, the page produces a table of training weights for common rep targets, from singles to sets of 12. That turns an abstract estimate into something you can load on the bar this week. It helps lifters who follow percentage programs, coaches writing sessions for groups of athletes, beginners curious about how strong they are becoming, and anyone returning from time off who wants a cautious starting point without testing a true max.

When to Use It

Starting a percentage-based strength program

A lifter downloads a program that prescribes sets at 80 percent and 85 percent of max, but has never tested a true single. She enters her recent hard set of five on squats, reads the estimated 1RM, and uses the training table to find the working weights for each prescribed percentage, rounding to the plates she has.

Tracking progress without risky testing

A recreational bench presser wants to know whether eight weeks of training worked, but does not want to grind out a heavy single alone. He compares the estimate from a set of six at the beginning with the estimate from a similar set now. A higher estimate at the same effort is a safe, repeatable indicator of progress.

Choosing weights after a layoff

After a month away from the gym with illness, a lifter wants to ease back in. He enters a moderate set from his first day back and compares it with his old estimate. The gap shows how much strength he has temporarily lost, so he can pick conservative loads instead of reloading the bar to old numbers.

Comparing athletes across different rep ranges

A coach has team members who tested with different weights and reps on the same lift, so the raw numbers cannot be compared. Running each athlete's set through the calculator converts them all to a common estimated max, giving her a fair ranking and a basis for assigning percentages to the entire group.

How to Use It, Step by Step

  1. Choose the unit at the top, LB or KG. This only changes the labels and the units shown in the results; the formulas work the same either way, and switching does not convert numbers already typed in the boxes.
  2. Enter the Weight lifted for your set. Use the total load, including the bar, in pounds or kilograms. For dumbbell lifts, decide whether you are entering one dumbbell or the pair, and stay consistent.
  3. Enter the Reps performed. The tool accepts whole numbers from 1 to 20, and it reads only the integer portion, so a typed 5.9 is treated as 5. Count only complete repetitions with good form and full range of motion.
  4. If your set was close to failure, trust the estimate more. A set of 5 where you could have done 10 will underestimate your max, because the formulas assume you stopped when you could not do another rep.
  5. Read the large Estimated one-rep max figure. Beneath it you will see the separate Epley and Brzycki values, which are each rounded to the nearest whole number and show how closely the two methods agree.
  6. Use the Training weights by rep target grid. It lists weights for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 reps at preset percentages from 100 percent down to 70 percent of your estimated max.
  7. Round the suggested weights to loads you can actually build with your plates. A calculation that says 182 pounds is best loaded as 180 or 185, depending on whether you want to err easy or hard.
  8. Repeat the calculation with a different set on a different day to check consistency. Estimates from several sets tend to cluster, and a number that stands far away from the rest probably came from a poor-technique or fatigued set.

Understanding Your Results

The headline figure is the average of the Epley and Brzycki outputs, rounded to a whole number. When you enter a single rep, the tool simply returns your weight as the 1RM, because there is nothing to extrapolate. The smaller line under the main number shows each formula alone so you can see the spread. A gap of a few pounds is normal; a larger gap usually means you entered a high rep count, where the two methods drift apart.

The training grid applies fixed percentages to your rounded estimate: 100 percent for 1 rep, 95 for 2, 93 for 3, 90 for 4, 87 for 5, 85 for 6, 80 for 8, 75 for 10, and 70 for 12. These are rule-of-thumb loads for sets taken near the limit. They are not guaranteed, because endurance varies widely from person to person, so someone who is naturally good at high reps may lift more than the grid says for 10 or 12.

To sanity-check, ask whether the estimate fits your experience. Your max should exceed any weight you have ever lifted for multiple reps, and a result more than about 10 to 15 percent above a hard recent triple is suspicious. Use the number as a planning tool: pick working weights from the grid, perform the sets, and record how they felt. If the planned loads feel too light or too heavy, adjust your working max rather than forcing the formula.

More Worked Examples

Heavy triple on the squat

Scenario: LB mode, 225 lb lifted for 3 reps.

Epley gives 225 × (1 + 3 ÷ 30) = 247.5, shown as 248. Brzycki gives 225 × 36 ÷ (37 − 3) = 238.2, shown as 238. The average is about 242.9, so the tool reports an estimated 1RM of 243 lb. The training grid then shows 226 lb for 3 reps, 211 lb for 5 reps, 194 lb for 8 reps, and 182 lb for 10 reps.

Moderate set in kilograms

Scenario: KG mode, 100 kg lifted for 8 reps.

Epley gives 100 × (1 + 8 ÷ 30) = 126.7, shown as 127. Brzycki gives 100 × 36 ÷ 29 = 124.1, shown as 124. Their average rounds to an estimated 1RM of 125 kg. In the grid, 5 reps are 109 kg, 8 reps are 100 kg (matching the set you did), and 12 reps are 84 kg.

High-rep set where the formulas disagree

Scenario: LB mode, 135 lb lifted for 15 reps.

Epley gives 135 × (1 + 15 ÷ 30) = 202.5, shown as 203. Brzycki gives 135 × 36 ÷ 22 = 220.9, shown as 221. That 18 lb gap shows how far apart the formulas drift at high reps. The average is an estimated 1RM of 212 lb, and the grid gives 184 lb for 5 reps. Treat this estimate with extra caution.

Tips for Better Results

  • Use sets of 3 to 6 reps taken to a hard but clean finish when you want the best estimate. That range is close enough to a max to be predictive but far enough away to keep the risk and fatigue of a true single out of the picture.
  • Compare estimates for the same lift in similar conditions. Equipment, bar height, rest time, and time of day all move your numbers, so a fair comparison between two dates needs the same setup and a similar level of effort.
  • Count only reps you would show a coach. If depth was short, the bar bounced off the chest, or your back rounded, subtract those reps first, otherwise the formulas credit you with strength you did not demonstrate.
  • Keep a record of the estimate, the actual set, and how hard it felt. Over a few months that log reveals trends that a single calculation never can, and it helps you notice if fatigue or poor sleep is dragging down your numbers.
  • Lower your working max by around 5 percent for a heavy training block or a deload week if you are tired. Programs are designed around the idea that your current capacity, not your best-day capacity, sets the load.
  • If you want to attempt a true max, treat the estimate as the target for your final warm-up ramp, not as a promise. Increase in small jumps, rest fully between attempts, use safeties or a spotter, and stop if technique degrades.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Entering a set you stopped well short of failure. The formulas assume the final rep was close to your limit, so a comfortable set of 5 will produce an estimate that is too low. Use a genuinely hard set for the clearest reading.
  • Using very high rep counts. At 15 or 20 reps the two formulas diverge noticeably, as the 135 lb for 15 example shows, and endurance plays a bigger role than strength, so the estimate is much less trustworthy.
  • Forgetting the weight of the bar. If the load you enter excludes the barbell, the estimate will be too low by the same proportion, and your percentage weights will be wrong when you load them on the bar.
  • Applying a barbell estimate to every exercise. The formulas were fitted mostly to major compound lifts, so results for lifts with heavy stabilization, balance, or skill demands, or for machines and isolation work, are less reliable.
  • Chasing the grid exactly. The percentages are averages, and your own performance at a given rep target may be higher or lower. Adjust the weights using how the set feels instead of insisting the table is correct.

Assumptions and Limits

  • The Epley and Brzycki equations are empirical curves that relate reps to maximum load. They represent an average lifter, so individual differences in muscle fiber makeup, training history, and technique can push your real max several percent higher or lower than the estimate.
  • The calculator accepts 1 to 20 reps, but the estimate is most dependable in the 1 to 10 range. Beyond that, muscular endurance dominates, and Brzycki's denominator shrinks toward zero as reps approach 37, which is one reason high-rep estimates run high.
  • Each formula's result is rounded to a whole number for display, and the average is calculated before rounding. The training grid then uses the rounded headline value, so a weight in the grid might differ by one unit from a hand calculation.
  • The percentage table is a general guide, not a prescription. People with injuries, joint problems, or cardiovascular conditions should clear heavy training with a clinician, and beginners benefit from coaching on technique before loading near-maximal weights.

Key Terms

1RM
One-repetition maximum, the heaviest load you can lift for a single properly performed rep on a given exercise.
Epley formula
An estimate that multiplies the weight lifted by one plus the number of reps divided by 30. It gives slightly higher values than Brzycki at low rep counts and lower values once reps climb past about 10.
Brzycki formula
An estimate that multiplies the weight lifted by 36 and divides by 37 minus the reps. Its denominator approaches zero near 37 reps, so it is unreliable for very high-rep sets.
Training max
A working number, often set a bit below your true 1RM, from which program percentages are calculated so that weights stay manageable and technique stays sound.
Rep range
The number of repetitions performed in a set. Lower rep ranges emphasize maximal strength, while higher ones bring in more muscular endurance.
Failure
The point where you cannot complete another repetition with proper form. Estimates are most accurate when the set finishes close to this point.
Read the guideHow do you calculate your one-rep max (1RM)?Estimate your one-rep max without testing it: the Epley and Brzycki formulas, a worked 185 lb bench press example, and a training percentage table.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate is a 1RM estimate?+

Very reliable when your set was in the 1–10 rep range. Beyond about 10 reps the estimate drifts, since strength and endurance diverge.

Should I actually test my true 1RM?+

Only with proper warm-up, technique, and ideally a spotter. Estimating from a submaximal set (like this tool does) is much safer for most lifters.

What are the percentages for?+

They’re common training loads — e.g. ~85% for 5 reps, ~75% for 10 — so you can program working sets from your estimated max.

Why do Epley and Brzycki give different numbers for the same lift?+

They model the relationship between reps and 1RM differently — Epley scales roughly linearly with reps ÷ 30, while Brzycki uses a curve based on 36 ÷ (37 − reps). The two formulas agree closely in the low-to-moderate rep range this calculator targets, which is why it reports both individually alongside the averaged estimate rather than picking just one.

Why can't I enter more than 20 reps?+

Above roughly 10 reps, rep-max formulas increasingly reflect muscular endurance rather than true strength, and their accuracy drops off sharply. Capping input at 20 keeps the estimate within a range the underlying math can still support — Brzycki's formula in particular becomes mathematically undefined at 37 reps, since its denominator hits zero.

Which rep count gives the most accurate 1RM estimate?+

Sets of about 2 to 6 reps taken near failure tend to give the most dependable predictions, because the load is close to your maximum and fatigue plays a smaller role. Singles are exact but risky, while sets above 10 reps drift because endurance, breathing, and pacing start to matter as much as raw strength. If you can, use a hard set in the low-to-middle rep range and keep your form consistent.

Does this work for machines, curls, and other isolation exercises?+

It will produce a number, but the formulas were built mainly from data on large barbell lifts like the bench press, squat, and deadlift. Machines vary in leverage and friction, and isolation exercises often show a flatter relationship between reps and load, so the estimate is less precise. It can still serve as a rough guide for programming, as long as you track results on the same machine and adjust based on feel.

How should I round the suggested weights to real plates?+

Round to the nearest load you can build with your equipment, usually in steps of 2.5 to 5 pounds or 1 to 2.5 kilograms. On a heavy day, round down so you can complete every rep with good form. When you are chasing a progression and feel fresh, rounding up slightly is acceptable. Consistency matters more than precision, so choose a rule and apply it each time.

How often should I update my estimated max?+

Many lifters recalculate every few weeks, or at the end of a training block, using a representative hard set. Updating every single session can create noise because daily fatigue, sleep, and stress change your performance. If your estimate rises steadily over several sessions, bump your working numbers up. If it falls, consider whether recovery, nutrition, or technique is the cause before lowering your plan.

Are there other 1RM formulas besides Epley and Brzycki?+

Yes. Lombardi, O'Conner, Mayhew, and several others exist, and each fits slightly different data. They agree reasonably well at low reps and diverge as the rep count rises. This calculator averages two commonly used equations to smooth out the quirks of either one. If you compare it with another tool and see a few pounds of difference, that is normal and reflects the choice of formula rather than a mistake.

Found this useful? Share it

Help someone else out — or link to it from your own site.

Link to this tool

Writing about one rep max calculator? Paste this on your site to link here.

<a href="https://everyfix.net/tools/one-rep-max-calculator/">One Rep Max Calculator</a> by <a href="https://everyfix.net">EveryFix</a>